|
Crime-fighting bills stall during session
By
Glenn Smith
The Post and Courier
Sunday, June 7, 2009

Scarlett Wilson

Leon Stavrinakis

Sen. Robert Ford

Mullen
Police
chiefs, prosecutors and mayors warned the Legislature this year that failure to
fix the state's troubled criminal justice system placed the public at grave risk
from career criminals.
Lawmakers
responded by failing to pass a single reform that the group requested.
Sidetracked by the stimulus feud and South Carolina's budget crisis, lawmakers
left a host of anti-crime proposals lingering on back burners and bogged down in
committees. Among the stalled measures were bills to give police more authority
to search criminals on probation and parole, put those who attempt murder behind
bars for life and allow judges to deny bail to repeat offenders charged with new
crimes.
"It's
really frustrating, not only for the community, but for the police officers who
arrest the same people over and over again," Charleston Police Chief Greg Mullen
said. "We just can't keep them in jail."
With
allies such as Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell and House Speaker Bobby
Harrell, both Charleston Republicans, local leaders had hoped for clear sailing
on the proposals. Though disappointed by the outcome, proponents took solace in
the fact that some measures advanced further than in past sessions. And they say
they intend to carry on the fight when the Legislature reconvenes next year.
"The
criminal justice system is substantially broken, and the only people who benefit
from that are the criminals," Charleston Mayor Joe Riley said. "We need more
members of the General Assembly who feel a sense of urgency about this.
"I know a
lot is going on, but making our state safer should be everyone's top priority,"
Riley said.
Riley
began pushing for new crime-fighting tools more than two years ago. He renewed
his efforts this year, aided by law enforcement officials, city leaders and
prosecutors such as 9th Circuit Solicitor Scarlett Wilson.
In
January, Riley organized a coalition of officials that met in Columbia to press
lawmakers to pass eight anti-crime bills. Other proposals included barring
convicted criminals from legally possessing pistols and military-style rifles,
toughening penalties for offenders who possess firearms while selling or making
drugs and requiring criminals to serve at least 85 percent of their sentences in
jail. Among those lending their support were State Law Enforcement Division
Director Reggie Lloyd and S.C. Attorney General Henry McMaster.
Wilson,
the solicitor for Charleston and Berkeley counties, said supporters were
optimistic because most of the measures would cost the state little or nothing
to implement. "I thought this was a great opportunity for lawmakers to help law
enforcement and prosecutors without having to spend more money," she said.
State
Sen. Robert Ford, a Charleston Democrat who has been a vocal supporter of
criminal justice reform, said it wasn't that lawmakers weren't listening or that
they necessarily object to change. The state budget crisis simply dominated the
discussion, he said, and lawmakers lost weeks of work due to furloughs aimed at
saving money. Ford predicted the anti-crime measures will gain traction next
year, the second half of the two-year session.
"We're
going to be in a good shape when all this stuff is passed," he said. "This was
just a strange, strange year."
Rep. Leon
Stavrinakis, D-Charleston, also predicted more progress next year, but he said
lawmakers still harbor concerns over some measures. Stavrinakis sits on the
House Judiciary Committee, which is mulling a bill that would allow police to
conduct warrantless searches of offenders on probation or parole. Both liberal
and conservative lawmakers have expressed concerns about giving police access to
homes where offenders live with others who have done nothing wrong, he said.
"This is
a new and fairly broad expansion of police search powers, and people just want
to make sure that it's done right," he said. "We're just trying to find some
common ground where we're not stepping on top of the rights of innocent people
who aren't on probation."
Mullen
said supporters of the bill worked out a change that would limit home searches
to areas under an offender's control, such as a bedroom.
Some on
the committee, however, object to residential searches being allowed at all, he
said.
Harrell
acknowledged some strong opposition to the bill, particularly among legislators
with backgrounds as criminal defense attorneys. But Harrell said he thinks their
concerns are off-base. People should know what they're getting into when they
invite a criminal into their homes, he said. "If someone doesn't want to subject
their residence to this, then don't let that person stay there," he said.
North
Charleston Police Chief Jon Zumalt said supporters need to convince the public
and lawmakers that the bills are needed and that these new powers won't be
abused. "We need to let legislators know that if we are given these new laws, we
will use them prudently and for the best interest of the state," Zumalt said.
Reach
Glenn Smith
at 937-5556 or gsmith@postand courier.com.
|